PX to REM Converter

Use our PX to REM converter to easily switch between pixel and REM units for responsive web design. Simplify your CSS font sizing today.

Pixels (PX) to REM

REM to Pixels (PX)

We’re assuming the standard default browser font-size of 16px

What are PX in CSS?

In CSS, PX (pixels) is an absolute unit of measurement used to define the size of elements. Unlike relative units such as EM and REM, PX provides fixed, non-scaling values that don’t change relative to the parent or root element. Here’s a breakdown of PX and its use cases:

Definition of PX:

• Pixels (PX): A pixel is a unit that corresponds to a single dot on a computer screen or display. In CSS, 1px represents one pixel of the display, regardless of screen resolution or size.
• Fixed Size: Unlike EM and REM, which are relative units, PX is an absolute unit, meaning it sets a fixed size for an element, regardless of the context or surrounding elements.

Characteristics of PX:

1. Absolute Measurement: PX provides an absolute value, meaning the size set using PX will remain the same, regardless of the surrounding environment or context (like parent elements).
2. Non-Responsive: Since PX is an absolute unit, it doesn’t scale automatically based on the user’s screen size, resolution, or browser settings. For responsive designs, PX is often less flexible than relative units like REM or percentages.
3. Precise Control: PX gives designers exact control over the sizing of elements. If you need a specific size, regardless of other factors, PX is a reliable option.
4. Device-Dependent: While PX is considered an absolute unit, its actual size may vary slightly across devices with different screen densities (e.g., standard displays vs. Retina displays). Modern browsers and operating systems often use techniques like device pixel ratio (DPR) to ensure that CSS pixels render consistently on high-resolution displays.

Use Cases of PX:

1. Precise Element Sizing: PX is ideal when you need exact dimensions for elements like buttons, icons, or images, where having fixed sizes is important for maintaining the design’s integrity.
   • Example: Setting a button’s width and height to 100px by 40px guarantees that the button will always be exactly that size, regardless of the device or browser.
2. Design Consistency: When creating pixel-perfect layouts where the designer requires precise and consistent sizing across different browsers, PX ensures that all elements render exactly as specified.
   • Example: For logos, icons, or fixed headers and footers, where exact size and alignment are critical, PX ensures they appear as intended across different devices.
3. Avoiding Scaling Issues: In some cases, using relative units like EM or REM might cause unintended scaling effects, especially in nested elements. PX can be used to avoid this issue by ensuring that elements remain fixed in size.
   • Example: When designing small interface elements like toolbars, status bars, or tiny UI components where scaling is undesirable, PX ensures the elements maintain their intended size.
4. When Responsiveness Isn’t Critical: PX is useful for components that do not need to scale or adapt to different screen sizes or resolutions, such as fixed-width sidebars, pixel-perfect graphics, or print-like layouts.
   • Example: In some fixed-width websites or specific sections where responsive design is not necessary, PX allows for precise control without worrying about how the design will scale.

When to Avoid PX:

1. Responsive Design: Since PX is an absolute unit, it doesn’t scale naturally with screen size or user preferences. For responsive design, using relative units like REM or percentages is generally better because they adjust based on the user’s device and settings.
2. Accessibility: PX can limit accessibility since users who increase or decrease their browser’s default font size may not see changes in elements sized with PX. This can lead to issues with text readability or layout usability for users with visual impairments.
3. Fluid Layouts: In modern web design, fluid and flexible layouts are more common, and PX can be rigid in comparison. For websites that need to adapt to various screen sizes and resolutions, relative units like REM or EM offer more flexibility.

Example of PX in CSS:

body {
font-size: 16px;
}

h1 {
font-size: 32px; /* Always 32px regardless of parent or screen size */
}

button {
width: 120px;
height: 40px;
padding: 10px;
}

Summary:

• Advantages:
  • Provides exact control over element sizing.
  • Ideal for fixed-size elements like icons, logos, and buttons.
  • Useful in designs that require pixel-perfect accuracy.
• Disadvantages:
  • Not responsive: Does not adjust automatically based on screen size or device.
  • Accessibility limitations: Does not scale with user settings or browser preferences.
  • Can lead to rigid designs that don’t adapt well to different environments.

In modern web development, while PX is still useful for certain fixed-size elements, it’s often used in combination with relative units like REM and EM to ensure both precision and responsiveness.

What is REM in CSS?

REM (Root Em) is a CSS unit of measurement that is relative to the root element (<html>) font size. It is commonly used in web design to create scalable and flexible layouts, ensuring that elements adjust proportionally based on the user’s settings or device preferences.

Here’s how REM works:

• REM: This unit is relative to the font size of the root element (usually the <html> tag). For example, if the font size of the root element is set to 16px, then 1rem equals 16px. If you use 2rem, it would be equal to 32px.

Using REM units provides consistent scaling across elements, especially when compared to absolute units like pixels (px). This is particularly useful for responsive design, where flexibility and adaptability to different screen sizes or user preferences are important.

Some key advantages of using REM:

• Consistency: REM ensures that scaling is consistent across the entire site because it references the root font size.
• Accessibility: It allows users to adjust font sizes based on their browser settings, making the website more accessible.
• Responsive Design: It works well with media queries and helps ensure that websites look good across different devices.

The difference between REM and EM:

• EM: EM is relative to the font size of the parent element, not the root element. This can sometimes lead to cascading size changes, making EM less predictable in complex layouts.

REM tends to be preferred for its simplicity and ease of control when designing responsive and accessible websites.

PX vs REM

Use Cases of PX and REM

Use Cases for PX (Pixels):

PX is one of the most commonly used CSS units for web design. It represents an absolute unit of measurement, where 1px is a fixed, non-scalable value. While PX units don’t scale with user preferences, they are reliable for maintaining precise control over design elements.

Pixel-Perfect Designs:

Use PX when you need precise control over the layout, ensuring that elements display exactly as intended on different devices. This is common for graphic-heavy designs, buttons, and icons where specific sizing is critical.

Example:

.icon {
width: 32px;
height: 32px;
}

Fixed-Width Layouts:

When creating fixed-width layouts (e.g., landing pages or banners) that need to maintain exact dimensions regardless of screen size or resolution, PX is often preferred. It ensures that elements remain the same size across different devices.

Example:

.container {
width: 960px;
}

Fonts with Fixed Sizes:

PX is often used for font sizes in specific elements where precise control is required, such as in logos, headings, or UI components where the font needs to remain consistent across different devices and browsers. However, PX can hinder accessibility if used too broadly in typography, as it doesn’t adapt to user settings.

Example:

h1 {
font-size: 36px;
}

Raster Images and Icon Sizing:

When dealing with raster images (PNG, JPG) or pixel-based icons, PX is ideal because images are based on pixels, and sizing them in PX ensures no distortion or scaling that could compromise image quality.

Example:

img {
width: 300px;
height: auto;
}

User Interface (UI) Components:

In UI design, many UI components (e.g., buttons, toolbars, form elements) are designed using PX values to ensure consistency across different browsers and screen resolutions, especially when maintaining pixel-perfect rendering is crucial.

Example:

.button {
padding: 10px 20px;
}

Legacy or Non-Responsive Designs:

Older websites or designs that aren’t responsive often use PX because it’s simple to implement and ensures consistent dimensions. Although this approach is not ideal for modern responsive designs, it can still be useful in controlled environments.

Use Cases for REM:

REM units are particularly useful when you want consistent scaling across the entire webpage, as they always relate to the root font size (typically set on the <html> element).

Global Font Sizing:

• If you want to ensure consistent font sizing across different elements and maintain responsiveness, REM is ideal.
• For example, setting the body or root font size in pixels (e.g., 16px) and using REM for headings, paragraphs, and other text allows uniform scaling across the entire page.

Example:

html { font-size: 16px; }
h1 { font-size: 2rem; } /* This equals 32px (2 * 16px) */
p { font-size: 1rem; } /* This equals 16px */

Responsive Design:

• REM is beneficial in creating responsive layouts. Since all elements scale according to the root font size, you can easily adjust the entire design by changing the root size in a media query.
• This is useful when designing for different screen sizes, such as mobile or desktop.

Example:

@media (max-width: 768px) {
html { font-size: 14px; } /* Adjusts all sizes based on the new root size */
}

Accessibility and User Preferences:

• REM supports accessibility by allowing users to adjust font sizes via browser settings. Since REM units scale according to the root element, changes in user preferences (such as increasing the default font size) will scale the entire design proportionally.

Consistent Spacing and Layout Elements:

• REM is often used for padding, margins, and other spacing-related properties to ensure consistency in layout, as everything scales from a single reference point (the root font size).

Example:

.container {
padding: 2rem; /* Scales with the root font size */
}

FAQ on PX to REM

What is a PX to REM converter?

A PX to REM converter is a tool I use to convert pixel values to REM units for web design. This helps me create responsive layouts by using relative sizing rather than fixed pixel sizes. Many CSS frameworks and tools like Bootstrap and Tailwind CSS rely on REM units for scalability.

Why should I use REM units?

REM units are relative to the root element, making them scalable and consistent across different screen sizes and devices. Using REM units in your CSS stylesheet ensures flexibility and better responsive web design – giving users a seamless experience whether they’re on mobile or desktop.

How do I convert PX to REM?

To convert PX to REM, I divide the pixel value by the base font size (usually 16px). For example, 32px becomes 2rem. Tools like Visual Studio Code with Chrome DevTools can make this process simpler, especially if I frequently tweak font sizes for user interfaces.

Can I use REM units for other properties besides font size?

Absolutely. I can use REM units for margins, paddings, and even layout dimensions. By doing so, I make sure my entire design scales consistently. For example, in my Flexbox layouts, using REM instead of PX can maintain visual hierarchy and design flexibility effectively.

How do REM units help in responsive design?

Using REM units allows designs to scale proportionally based on the root font size. For instance, changes in the base font size will adjust all elements proportionally. This is particularly useful when combining with media queries to ensure that my layouts adapt to different devices seamlessly.

What’s the difference between REM and EM units?

REM units are relative to the root element, while EM units are relative to their parent element. This distinction means REM units provide more predictable scalability. When working in front-end development, sticking to REM helps in avoiding those unexpected overrides that sometimes occur with nested EM units.

Are there any downsides to using REM units?

While REM units offer flexibility, they depend on the base font size. If it changes, all dependent sizes change too. It’s crucial to test thoroughly, using tools like Firefox Developer Edition or Sublime Text for smooth scaling and to avoid issues from unexpected resizing.

How do I set a base font size in CSS?

To set a base font size in CSS, I usually go to the <html> selector in my CSS3 code and define the font-size property. For example, html { font-size: 16px; }. This makes calculations and conversions straightforward and consistent across the entire website.

Can I mix PX and REM in the same stylesheet?

Yes, I can mix PX and REM in the same stylesheet, though it’s essential to use them wisely. For consistent scaling, REM units are better for layout elements and typography. PX can be used sparingly for precise control over small elements or design system components in CSS.

Should I use REM or VW/VH units?

REM units offer scalable font and layout design relative to the base font size, while VW/VH units are relative to the viewport size. In responsive web design, REM units serve typography well, while VW/VH can be great for full-page layouts and dynamic sizing depending on screen dimensions.

Our Converters